Chromium Single Cell Gene Expression

Cell Ranger6.1, printed on 09/20/2024

The `count`, `multi`, `aggr`, and `reanalyze` pipelines output several CSV files which contain automated secondary analysis results. A subset of these results are used to render the **Analysis** view in the `count` run summary and **Sample** and **Library** views in the `multi` run summary.

Before clustering the cells, Principal Component Analysis (PCA) is run on the normalized filtered feature-barcode matrix to reduce the number of feature (gene) dimensions. Only gene expression features are used as PCA features. The PCA analysis produces four output files. The first is a projection of each cell onto the first N principal components. By default N=10 (N=100 when chemistry batch correction is enabled); when running `reanalyze`, you can choose to increase it.

$ cd /home/jdoe/runs/sample345/outs $ head -2 analysis/pca/10_components/projection.csv Barcode,PC-1,PC-2,PC-3,PC-4,PC-5,PC-6,PC-7,PC-8,PC-9,PC-10 AAACATACAACGAA-1,-0.2765,-5.7056,6.5324,-12.2736,-1.4390,-1.1656,-0.1754,-2.9748,3.3785,1.6539

The second file is a components matrix which indicates how much each feature contributed (the loadings) to each principal component. Features that were not included in the PCA analysis have all of their loading values set to zero.

$ head -2 analysis/pca/10_components/components.csv PC,ENSG00000228327,ENSG00000237491,ENSG00000177757,ENSG00000225880,...,ENSG00000160310 1,-0.0044,0.0039,-0.0024,-0.0016,...,-0.0104

The third file records the proportion of total variance explained by each principal component. When choosing the number of principal components that are significant, it is useful to look at the plot of variance explained as a function of PC rank - when the numbers start to flatten out, subsequent PCs are unlikely to represent meaningful variation in the data.

$ head -5 analysis/pca/10_components/variance.csv PC,Proportion.Variance.Explained 1,0.0056404970744118104 2,0.0038897311237809061 3,0.0028803714818085419 4,0.0020830581822081206

The final file lists the normalized dispersion of each feature, after binning features by their mean expression across the dataset. This provides a useful measure of variability of each feature.

$ head -5 analysis/pca/10_components/dispersion.csv Feature,Normalized.Dispersion ENSG00000228327,2.0138970131886671 ENSG00000237491,1.3773662040549017 ENSG00000177757,-0.28102027567224191 ENSG00000225880,1.9887312950109921

After running PCA, t-distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE) is run to visualize cells in a 2-D space.

$ head -5 analysis/tsne/2_components/projection.csv Barcode,TSNE-1,TSNE-2 AAACATACAACGAA-1,-13.5494,1.4674 AAACATACTACGCA-1,-2.7325,-10.6347 AAACCGTGTCTCGC-1,12.9590,-1.6369 AAACGCACAACCAC-1,-9.3585,-6.7300

After running PCA, Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) is run to visualize cells in a 2-D space.

$ head -5 analysis/umap/2_components/projection.csv Barcode,UMAP-1,UMAP-2 AAACCTGAGAATAGGG-1,0.5974335,1.320372 AAACCTGAGAGCTGGT-1,2.2277818,-0.52756095 AAACCTGAGCGTTGCC-1,2.675832,1.1010709 AAACCTGCACGGACAA-1,2.7049212,-3.1494563

Clustering is then run to group cells together that have similar expression profiles, based on their projection into PCA space.
Graph-based clustering (under `graphclust`) is run once as it does not require a pre-specified number of clusters. K-means (under `kmeans`) is run for many values of K=2,...,N where K corresponds to the number of clusters. By default N=10; when running `reanalyze`, you can choose to increase it. The corresponding results for each K is separated into its own directory.

$ ls analysis/clustering graphclust kmeans_10_clusters kmeans_2_clusters kmeans_3_clusters kmeans_4_clusters kmeans_5_clusters kmeans_6_clusters kmeans_7_clusters kmeans_8_clusters kmeans_9_clusters

For each clustering, `cellranger` produces cluster assignments for each cell.

$ head -5 analysis/clustering/kmeans_3_clusters/clusters.csv Barcode,Cluster AAACATACAACGAA-1,2 AAACATACTACGCA-1,2 AAACCGTGTCTCGC-1,1 AAACGCACAACCAC-1,3

`cellranger` also produces a table indicating which features are differentially expressed in each cluster relative to all other clusters. For each feature and each cluster *i*, we compute three values:

- The mean expression of this feature in cluster
*i*(i.e., across cells assigned to cluster*i*) - The log2 fold-change of this feature's mean expression in cluster
*i*relative to all other cells - A p-value denoting significance of this feature's expression in cluster
*i*relative to cells in other clusters. P-values within each cluster are adjusted for false discovery rate to account for the number of hypotheses (i.e., number of features) being tested.

For details on the mean expression normalization and statistical test, see algorithms.

Differential expression results are located in a different directory than the clustering results, but follows the same structure, with each clustering separated into its own directory.

$ head -5 analysis/diffexp/kmeans_3_clusters/differential_expression.csv Feature ID,Feature Name,Cluster 1 Mean UMI Counts,Cluster 1 Log2 fold change,Cluster 1 Adjusted p value,Cluster 2 Mean UMI Counts,Cluster 2 Log2 fold change,Cluster 2 Adjusted p value,Cluster 3 Mean UMI Counts,Cluster 3 Log2 fold change,Cluster 3 Adjusted p value ENSG00000228327,RP11-206L10.2,0.0056858989363338264,2.6207666981569986,0.00052155805898912184,0.0,-0.75299726644507814,0.64066099091888962,0.00071455453829430329,-2.3725403666493312,0.0043023680184636837 ENSG00000237491,RP11-206L10.9,0.00012635330969630726,-0.31783275717885928,0.40959138980118809,0.0,3.8319652342760779,0.11986963938734894,0.0,0.56605908868652577,0.39910771338768203 ENSG00000177757,FAM87B,0.0,-2.9027952579000154,0.0,0.0,3.2470027335549219,0.19129034227967889,0.00071455453829430329,3.1510215894076818,0.0 ENSG00000225880,LINC00115,0.0003790599290889218,-5.71015017995762,8.4751637615375386e-28,0.20790015775229512,7.965820981010868,1.3374521290889345e-46,0.0017863863457357582,-2.2065304152104019,0.00059189960914085744

If you analyzed a multi-species experiment, the analysis output will look different. For example, the human-mouse mixing experiment is run to verify system functionality. It consists of mixing approximately 600 human (HEK293T) cells and 600 mouse (3T3) cells in a 1:1 ratio.

`cellranger` produces a single analysis CSV file indicating whether each GEM contains only a single human cell (hg19), a single mouse cell (mm10) or multiple mouse and human cells (Multiplet).

$ cd /home/jdoe/runs/sample345/outs $ head -5 analysis/gem_classification.csv barcode,hg19,mm10,call AAACATACACCTCC-1,3,815,mm10 AAACATACACCTGA-1,14,780,mm10 AAACATACACGTGT-1,2,439,mm10 AAACATACAGACTC-1,700,776,Multiplet